In cloud computing, “upgrades” often mean benefits for customers - better performance, new features, and enhanced value. But a recent and 'what seemed like' a small change in the Azure OpenAI Service has led to unexpected cost increases for some customers.

What happened to Azure? Let's talk about the upgrade 

The issue revolves around Microsoft’s Provisioned Throughput Unit (PTU), a premium Azure AI feature that lets enterprises reserve guaranteed capacity for accessing Microsoft-hosted language models. Each PTU provides a fixed number of tokens per minute (TPM), ensuring consistent throughput and performance for large or latency-sensitive workloads.

Recently, Microsoft swapped the underlying model for GPT-4o-mini with the newer GPT-4.1-mini. And yes, while this introduced a more advanced model, it also had an unintended effect for PTU users: higher costs.

The Core Problem: A Recalibrated PTU Ratio

When Microsoft changed the model, they also recalibrated the TPM allocation for each PTU.

This resulted in existing PTU reservations delivering fewer tokens per minute than before. To maintain the same performance and user experience, customers must purchase more PTUs, increasing costs even though workloads and usage remain the same.

Microsoft has explained that GPT-4.1-mini provides more “value per token” because of improvements in instruction following, coding accuracy, and a larger context window. These are valid benefits, but the practical reality is that customers are now paying more for the same workload.

How to Respond - Managing the Commercial and Technical Impact

To address the increased costs, we recommend businesses take a multi-pronged approach, combining negotiation, technical adjustments, and commercial restructuring. 

1. Commercial and Contractual Negotiation

Because this cost increase comes from Microsoft’s unilateral change, customers have strong leverage in negotiations.

Grandfathering and price protection: Ask for “grandfathering” clauses in your Enterprise Agreement (EA) or Azure MACC (Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment). This can lock in the original GPT-4o-mini throughput rates or ensure the cost per million tokens remains consistent, even if TPM per PTU changes.

Note: What is a grandfather clause? It means that old rules still apply to existing people or situations, even after new rules are introduced.

Retroactive credits: Has the change already affected your billing? Request retroactive credits or cost offsets during your next EA amendment or Azure commitment review. This approach directly addresses a Microsoft-driven price shift for a stable workload.

2. Technical and Deployment Strategies: 

Here are some practical steps to help minimise the technical and cost impact:

Hybrid Model strategy: Use GPT-4.1-mini only for complex, high-value tasks. For simpler workloads, such as basic text generation or summarisation, use cheaper models like GPT-3.5 Turbo or GPT-4o.

PTU and Pay-As-You-Go Mix: Reserve PTUs when workloads are predictable and consistent. Handle traffic spikes using Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) endpoints. This hybrid approach helps avoid over-provisioning PTUs.

Model optimisation: Reduce token consumption through prompt optimisation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and output length controls. This can reduce costs without compromising on quality.

3. Commercial Restructuring

If you're part of a larger enterprise, you could try these financial strategies:

Realign Azure MACC: Negotiate with Microsoft to apply more of your Azure Consumption Commitment towards AI PTUs - with the chance of a discounted rate. There are dual benefits - improving your AI economics and Microsoft’s overall cloud adoption metrics.

Private offers and EA amendments: Microsoft may be open to custom AI SKUs or special pricing via private offers or EA amendments, especially for strategic or large-scale AI workloads.

Azure Guidance with Keystone Negotiation

In the end, this price increase was less about customer behaviour, more about Microsoft's internal model update. As a customer, this has given you strong negotiating power. You can use this to pursue credits, price protections, or better commercial terms during your next renewal.

With the speed of the uptake of AI, it's so important to stay proactive. Smart contract negotiation ensures your organisation maintains cost control and performance efficiency in Azure AI.

For help from the experts, contact your Keystone Advisor for guidance on commercial strategy, technical optimisation, and contract negotiation.

FAQs

1. Why did my Azure OpenAI costs increase after the GPT-4o-mini to GPT-4.1-mini upgrade?

The upgrade changed the underlying model architecture, reducing the number of tokens per minute (TPM) allocated per Provisioned Throughput Unit (PTU). This means the same workloads now require more PTUs to maintain throughput, leading to higher overall costs.

2. What’s the difference between GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4.1-mini in Azure OpenAI?

GPT-4.1-mini offers better instruction-following, larger context windows, and improved code generation. However, it also consumes more resources per token and delivers fewer TPM per PTU, which can increase operational costs for provisioned customers.

3. How can I reduce Azure OpenAI PTU costs after the GPT-4.1-mini update?

You can offset cost increases by:

  • Using a hybrid model approach (mixing GPT-4.1-mini with cheaper models like GPT-3.5 Turbo).
  • Optimising prompts to reduce token usage.
  • Combining PTU with Pay-As-You-Go usage to avoid over-provisioning.
  • Negotiating credits or price protection with Microsoft.

4. Can I negotiate with Microsoft over the Azure OpenAI PTU price change?

Yes. Since the cost impact resulted from Microsoft’s internal model swap, customers can request grandfathering clauses, retroactive credits, or custom pricing in their Enterprise Agreement (EA) or Azure MACC. Microsoft has granted such adjustments in similar circumstances.

5. What is a grandfathering clause in Azure contracts?

A grandfathering clause means that the original pricing or throughput terms continue to apply to existing customers, even after Microsoft updates the model or pricing structure. It’s a key tool to maintain budget predictability in Azure AI workloads.

6. Is GPT-4.1-mini worth the higher cost for enterprise AI workloads?

That depends on your use case. For high-accuracy, context-heavy, or code-intensive tasks, GPT-4.1-mini can justify the cost. For simpler workloads like summarisation or tagging, GPT-3.5 or GPT-4o often deliver better value per token.

7. How do Provisioned Throughput Units (PTUs) differ from Pay-As-You-Go in Azure AI?

PTUs offer guaranteed capacity and consistent latency, ideal for steady or mission-critical workloads. Pay-As-You-Go provides flexibility for unpredictable traffic. A hybrid strategy combining both can optimise cost and performance.

8. What should enterprises do to manage Azure AI costs long-term?

Regularly review your PTU allocation, monitor token efficiency, and re-negotiate Azure contract terms during renewals. Working with an advisor like Keystone can help secure credits, price protection, and optimal resource distribution.

9. Can Microsoft change Azure OpenAI models without notice?

Yes, model upgrades can occur automatically within a deployment family (e.g. GPT-4o-mini → GPT-4.1-mini). These updates can alter performance and cost structures, so it’s essential to review Azure release notes and model documentation regularly.

10. Who can help negotiate Azure AI pricing or structure contracts?

Specialist advisors like Keystone assist enterprises with Azure MACC realignment, private offers, and EA amendments, ensuring your AI spend stays aligned with performance and cost efficiency goals.

Contact Keystone Negotiation to learn more! 

References